32
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: +
→Your failure to accept evolution
:::: [[95 Theses against Evolution]]--[[User:AK|AK]] 17:19, 4 May 2012 (EDT)
:::: [[95 Theses against Evolution]]--[[User:AK|AK]] 17:19, 4 May 2012 (EDT)
:::::Add. "These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and '''know what they're talking about'''. '''Unlike your faith-based''', unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence " - I'm afraid that's something we can agree on, just see [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Evolution#Evolution_as_a_.22fact.22 this].--[[User:AK|AK]] 09:14, 5 May 2012 (EDT)
:::::Add. "These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and '''know what they're talking about'''. '''Unlike your faith-based''', unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence " - I'm afraid that's something we can agree on, just see [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Evolution#Evolution_as_a_.22fact.22 this].--[[User:AK|AK]] 09:14, 5 May 2012 (EDT)
Sadly, this is true. I suggest this quote: "''There are no peer reviewed articles by anyone advocating for intelligent design supported by pertinent experiments or calculations which provide detailed rigorous accounts of how intelligent design of any biological system occurred''", (Michael Behe, creation scientist). And please don't accuse me of being liberal. I'm not. I find that rather disturbing that conservatism is often combined with anti-science creationism nonsense. [[User:WJM|PB]] 17:00, 27 May 2012 (EDT)