188
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + +
Debate:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements? (view source)
Revision as of 14:00, April 24, 2007
, 14:00, April 24, 2007no edit summary
==Yes==
==Yes==
If im to be asked, i have seen few pretty questionable bans, but i can now remember only two specific ones that fit the queastion. Those are the bans of Catwatcher and Jacobin when editing article Deceit. Both where banned for 3 days, if i remember correctly. Jacobin for deleting the uncited claim that liberalists dont teach that deceit is wrong and Catwathcher from adding {{fact}} to the claims in the article. Didn't know where to search for the logs anymore, but if anyone can find those and provide more about the reason of the bans, please feel free.
Furthermore i think the 90%/10% rule is used here mostly to shut up the people presenting inconvient questions or atleast scare them to be quiet. and i think examples from that are plenty. Most reasent in my opinnion is Mr. Aschlafly:s response to Hacker at his talk page regarding the series of questions Hacker made. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 10:00, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
==No==
==No==