SkipCaptcha
409
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy? (view source)
Revision as of 22:33, September 12, 2023
, 22:33, September 12, 2023→Feedback: new section
It's simply easier to not pretend, keep your nose out of where it does not belong, and admit when you made an error, rather than spend 18 months writing 2 dozen Essays of pure nonsense and crap. "Yah, but Rob, I get page views". Congratulations. I hope you're proud of being deceptive and misleading conservative students. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:38, September 12, 2023 (EDT)
It's simply easier to not pretend, keep your nose out of where it does not belong, and admit when you made an error, rather than spend 18 months writing 2 dozen Essays of pure nonsense and crap. "Yah, but Rob, I get page views". Congratulations. I hope you're proud of being deceptive and misleading conservative students. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:38, September 12, 2023 (EDT)
== Feedback ==
Looks alright to me, Ben. I'd add that it's mostly a product of political extremes: both far-left and far-right actors have their own reasons for promoting a weaker, more fractured international order and more chaos generally.
In terms of how people can so readily ignore so much evidence to the contrary, you should probably have a section on the interplay between motivated reasoning and the Dunning-Kruger effect. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 18:33, September 12, 2023 (EDT)