Changes

::After all is said and done, statist picking and choosing of winners and losers is not as dynamic, prosperity creating or stable as capitalism overall - especially over the long run.[https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Communist_China%E2%80%99s_quixotic_quest_to_innovate:_A_statist_economy_can%E2%80%99t_make_creativity_greatly_blossom#Free_markets.2Fcapitalism_vs._a_more_socialistic_economic_system_like_China.27s._The_USA_is_more_innovative_and_prosperous_than_China]  

::After all is said and done, statist picking and choosing of winners and losers is not as dynamic, prosperity creating or stable as capitalism overall - especially over the long run.[https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Communist_China%E2%80%99s_quixotic_quest_to_innovate:_A_statist_economy_can%E2%80%99t_make_creativity_greatly_blossom#Free_markets.2Fcapitalism_vs._a_more_socialistic_economic_system_like_China.27s._The_USA_is_more_innovative_and_prosperous_than_China]  

::For a while, the Soviet Union and Japan were high flyers, but their economic castles were built on sand. China's deflation shows that it is at the beginning stage of [[Japanification]] which is a type of economic stagnation.[https://archive.is/tifb2][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:11, January 27, 2025 (EST)

::For a while, the Soviet Union and Japan were high flyers, but their economic castles were built on sand. China's deflation [https://archive.is/tifb2 shows] that it is at the beginning stage of [[Japanification]] which is a type of economic stagnation.[https://archive.is/tifb2][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:11, January 27, 2025 (EST)