1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − =='''Post Your Thoughts'''==+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 15:33, January 15, 2010
, 15:33, January 15, 2010→Post Your Thoughts
{{debate-politics}}
{{debate-politics}}
No!
If ID, or creationism should be tought at school, keep it out of science classes.
Why?
Because neither of themhave any scientific merrit. It's a poor attempt to use some scientific method to fit their perception of the world into biblical context. If Creationism should be tought at school well, then ALL creationist ideas should be tought at school. not only christian Creationism, but hinduism, Shamanism, Asatru Creationism, Aborigini creationism, and shyamanism.
Creationism is nothing more than a prolonged arm of a religious agenda.
Want fair and balanced knowledge?
Let the students learn about all religions in school. but keep it ou of bioogy classes, or anything that remotelly resembles science. Because science it is not.
Thanks
Bohemianwriter1