Difference between revisions of "Evolution by natural selection"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(redo link) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: | ||
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design] | :If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The problem with this statement is that evolution by natural selection is ''not'' a scientific doctrine; it is a scientific ''theory''. | ||
[[Category:Evolution]] | [[Category:Evolution]] | ||
Revision as of 17:29, August 26, 2012
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
- If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental assumption on which it's based, is a legitimate part of science as well. Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design
The problem with this statement is that evolution by natural selection is not a scientific doctrine; it is a scientific theory.