Difference between revisions of "Evolution by natural selection"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA (PBS)|NOVA]]: | ||
:If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design] | :If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental [[assumption]] on which it's based, is a legitimate part of [[science]] as well. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Evolution]] | [[Category:Evolution]] | ||
Revision as of 17:58, August 26, 2012
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
- If evolution by natural selection is a scientific doctrine, then the critique of that doctrine, and even of the fundamental assumption on which it's based, is a legitimate part of science as well. Intelligent Design on Trial - In Defense of Intelligent Design
