Difference between revisions of "Scientific observation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a quote by Richard Feynmann, the late physicist who figured out the Challenger disaster)
 
(Adding section "See Also")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think it is very important--at least it was to me--that if you are going to teach people to make observations, you should show that something wonderful can come from them. I learned then what science was about: it was patience. If you looked, and you watched, and you paid attention, you got a great reward from it--although possibly not every time. As a result, when I became a more mature man, I would painstakingly, hour after hour, for years, work on problems--sometimes many years, sometimes shorter times; many of them failing, lots of stuff going into the wastebasket--but every once in a while there was the gold of a new understanding that I had learned to expect when I was a kid, the result of observation. For I did not learn that observation was not worthwhile. - [[Richard Feynmann]] [http://www.southerncrossreview.org/32/feynman3.htm]
 
I think it is very important--at least it was to me--that if you are going to teach people to make observations, you should show that something wonderful can come from them. I learned then what science was about: it was patience. If you looked, and you watched, and you paid attention, you got a great reward from it--although possibly not every time. As a result, when I became a more mature man, I would painstakingly, hour after hour, for years, work on problems--sometimes many years, sometimes shorter times; many of them failing, lots of stuff going into the wastebasket--but every once in a while there was the gold of a new understanding that I had learned to expect when I was a kid, the result of observation. For I did not learn that observation was not worthwhile. - [[Richard Feynmann]] [http://www.southerncrossreview.org/32/feynman3.htm]
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[Empirical science]]
 +
*[[Experimental science]]
 +
*[[Historical science]]
 +
*[[Operation science]]
 +
*[[Origin science]]
 +
[[category:science]]
 +
[[category:scientific disciplines]]
 +
[[category:Methodology of Science]]
 +
[[Category:Political Pressure on Scientists]]

Revision as of 15:59, October 11, 2012

I think it is very important--at least it was to me--that if you are going to teach people to make observations, you should show that something wonderful can come from them. I learned then what science was about: it was patience. If you looked, and you watched, and you paid attention, you got a great reward from it--although possibly not every time. As a result, when I became a more mature man, I would painstakingly, hour after hour, for years, work on problems--sometimes many years, sometimes shorter times; many of them failing, lots of stuff going into the wastebasket--but every once in a while there was the gold of a new understanding that I had learned to expect when I was a kid, the result of observation. For I did not learn that observation was not worthwhile. - Richard Feynmann [1]

See also