Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
478 bytes added ,  18:27, January 28, 2013
m
Reverted edits by Barack (talk) to last revision by Randall7
Line 5: Line 5:  
The majority of physical scientists, who often hold an [[atheism|atheistic]] worldview and/or insist on employing [[methodological naturalism]], however, have currently accepted the two aspects of evolution mentioned above since at least the 20th century.  It has been alleged that these scientists insist on the validity of macroevolution on philosophical/religious grounds and not due to the actual evidence that they have found.
 
The majority of physical scientists, who often hold an [[atheism|atheistic]] worldview and/or insist on employing [[methodological naturalism]], however, have currently accepted the two aspects of evolution mentioned above since at least the 20th century.  It has been alleged that these scientists insist on the validity of macroevolution on philosophical/religious grounds and not due to the actual evidence that they have found.
   −
there is no god dipshits
+
==Gradual appearance==
 +
 
 +
Mainstream geologists and biologists believe that [[fossil]]s show the body plans of dead animals and plants, and that these can be assign ages ranging from hundreds of thousands to hundreds of millions of years (see [[carbon dating]]). This evidence is disputed by [[Creation science|Scientific Creationism]] because they hold to the premise that the [[Earth]] is less than 10,000 years old, and thus they question the validity of the physical evidence.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Evolution]]
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu