Difference between revisions of "Government regulation of greenhouse-gas emissions"
From Conservapedia
m (cat) |
(dead end page links/merge suggestions) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse | + | {{merge|greenhouse gas}}{{merge|Cap and Trade}}"... prominent [[scientists]] and [[climatology|climatologists]] called [[government]] regulation of [[greenhouse gas]] emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/new-epa-inspector-general-report-one-more-reason-to-reject-climate-change-regulation#_edn16] |
[[Category:Environmentalism]] | [[Category:Environmentalism]] | ||
Revision as of 17:20, April 20, 2013
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with greenhouse gas. (Discuss)
It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Cap and Trade. (Discuss)
"... prominent scientists and climatologists called government regulation of greenhouse gas emissions “irresponsible and immoral” because of the lack of credible evidence that such emissions threaten to human health or public welfare." [1]
