Changes

2,587 bytes added ,  00:57, September 25, 2014
more restoration of text
Line 6: Line 6:  
The theory of evolution suggests that humans evolved to their present state like all living organisms.  This implies that, should selective pressures change, humans as a species may also change.  In the early 20th century, the term ''Social Darwinism'' was in fashion.  This idea stated that the fittest people did the best in life, and tautologically, those who did the best were the fittest.  This was often used as a justification for racism and other oppression.  Since evolutionary theory does not really apply to individuals, but to populations, this was never a valid application of the theory.  However, this idea has continued to be a popular topic.
 
The theory of evolution suggests that humans evolved to their present state like all living organisms.  This implies that, should selective pressures change, humans as a species may also change.  In the early 20th century, the term ''Social Darwinism'' was in fashion.  This idea stated that the fittest people did the best in life, and tautologically, those who did the best were the fittest.  This was often used as a justification for racism and other oppression.  Since evolutionary theory does not really apply to individuals, but to populations, this was never a valid application of the theory.  However, this idea has continued to be a popular topic.
   −
[[Charles Darwin]] declared in ''The Descent of Man'':
+
[[Charles Darwin]] declared in ''The Descent of Man'':<ref>Charles Darwin, ''The Descent of Man'' (London: John Murray, 1901), pp. 241-42 (footnote * is a reference to ''Anthropological Review'', April, 1867, p. 236). [http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-descent-of-man/chapter-06.html]</ref>
    
:At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.  At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will no doubt be exterminated.  The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
 
:At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.  At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will no doubt be exterminated.  The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
Line 18: Line 18:  
The word "eugenics" is based on Greek roots meaning "well born."  The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides 1883 as the date of origin for the term.  Later, Darwin's son, Leonard, served as the president of the First Congress of Eugenics in 1912 in London.
 
The word "eugenics" is based on Greek roots meaning "well born."  The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides 1883 as the date of origin for the term.  Later, Darwin's son, Leonard, served as the president of the First Congress of Eugenics in 1912 in London.
   −
The encyclopedia describes eugenics as now being "in disrepute," although Professor Peter Singer of Princeton University has sought to remove the stigma from it.  Richard Dawkins has stated in one letter that it no longer be banned from polite discussion.
+
The encyclopedia describes eugenics as now being "in disrepute,"<ref>[http://www.fwkc.com/encyclopedia/low/articles/e/e007001431f.html]</ref> although Professor Peter Singer of Princeton University has sought to remove the stigma from it.  Richard Dawkins has stated in one letter that it no longer be banned from polite discussion.<ref>[http://www.sundayherald.com/life/people/display.var.1031440.0.eugenics_may_not_be_bad.php]</ref>
    
In the early 1900s, many influential officials advocated Darwinism and eugenics.  Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes became a strong proponent.  So did many others in prominent government and academic positions.  Members of the British Eugenics Society, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation, are listed [http://www.africa2000.com/ENDX/eug_ij.htm).
 
In the early 1900s, many influential officials advocated Darwinism and eugenics.  Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes became a strong proponent.  So did many others in prominent government and academic positions.  Members of the British Eugenics Society, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation, are listed [http://www.africa2000.com/ENDX/eug_ij.htm).
Line 24: Line 24:  
==Eugenics in America==
 
==Eugenics in America==
   −
Between 1907 and 1937, 32 American states passed eugenics laws requiring sterilization of citizens deemed to be misfits, such as the mentally infirm.  Oliver Wendell Holmes and all but one conservative Democratic Justice upheld such laws in a Supreme Court decision that included Holmes' offensive statement that "three generations of imbeciles are enough."  Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 207 (1927).  In fact, the third generation "imbecile" was very bright, but was declared by a eugenics "expert" as "supposed to be a mental defective," apparently without an examination.
+
Between 1907 and 1937, 32 American states passed eugenics laws requiring sterilization of citizens deemed to be misfits, such as the mentally infirm.  Oliver Wendell Holmes and all but one conservative Democratic Justice upheld such laws in a Supreme Court decision that included Holmes' offensive statement that "three generations of imbeciles are enough."  Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 207 (1927).<ref>[http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html]</ref> In fact, the third generation "imbecile" was very bright, but was declared by a eugenics "expert" as "supposed to be a mental defective," apparently without an examination.
 +
 
 +
Eugenics was taught as part of the evolution curriculum of many science classes in America in the early 1900s.  For example, it was featured in the textbook used in the famous Scopes trial in 1925.
 +
 
 +
"By 1928, the American Genetics Association boasted that there were 376 college courses devoted exclusively to eugenics.  High-school biology textbooks followed suit by the mid-1930s, with most containing material favorable to the idea of eugenical control of reproduction.  It would thus have been difficult to be an even moderately educated reader in the 1920s or 1930s and not have known, at least in general terms, about the claims of eugenics."<ref>''See'' "Science misapplied: the eugenics age revisited," Technology Review, August-Sep 1996 (Vol. 99, No. 6), at p. 22(10), by Garland E. Allen.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Important remnatnts of the evolution-eugenics approach exist today, in part because many of Justice Holmes' opinions are still controlling law.  The very first quote in the infamous Roe v. Wade abourtion decision is an unprincipled statement of Justice Holmes in a 1905 opinion.  Indeed, Holmes once wrote favorably in a letter to a future Supreme Court Justice about "restricting propagation by the undesirables and putting to death infants that didn't pass the examination.<ref>9/3/21 Letter to Felix Frankfurther.  For a detailed criticism of Justice Holmes' judicial Darwinism, see Professor Albert W. Alschuler's Law Without Values:  The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes (Univ. of Chicago Press 2000).</ref>
 +
 
 +
Existing laws requiring students to receive controversial vaccines are based on a eugenics-era decision granting the State the power to forcibly vaccinate residents.  <ref>Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).</ref>  That decision, in fact, was the cited precedent for Justice Holmes' offensive "imbeciles" holding quoted above.
 +
 
 +
For the same reason that evolution teaching led to eugenics, evolution teaching today encourages acceptance of abortion and euthanasia.  Under evolution theory, after all, we are merely animals fighting for biological survival.
    
==Genocide==
 
==Genocide==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,708

edits