SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 04:58, December 22, 2014
, 04:58, December 22, 2014→Two millionth page view for the "Counterexamples to Relativity" page: Forgot something that John Hancock did not forget.
The same thing goes for the mass discrepancy. Conservation of mass had been known, with extreme precision, by 1900. Scientists were in fact startled and intrigued by its non-conservation. By the way, it can be measured with greater accuracy now than 82 years ago, and it still holds, or do you deny that it happens? Can you cite modern precise measurements that show that the discrepancy is zero? Can you come up with a theory that explains this phenomenon quantitatively?
The same thing goes for the mass discrepancy. Conservation of mass had been known, with extreme precision, by 1900. Scientists were in fact startled and intrigued by its non-conservation. By the way, it can be measured with greater accuracy now than 82 years ago, and it still holds, or do you deny that it happens? Can you cite modern precise measurements that show that the discrepancy is zero? Can you come up with a theory that explains this phenomenon quantitatively?
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:58, 21 December 2014 (EST)
==Categories==
==Categories==