Changes

Line 436: Line 436:  
:: Quote <b>Right now, I think the odds are pretty much zero given your level of content creation</b>.  Doesn't mean SamHB is not right though.  The edits from the redoubt are so obviously either parody or highly biased POV pushing that it is difficult to argue otherwise.  Woo is not encyclopedic, no matter who peddles the woo.  Now I leave both redoubt and the collective known as User:Conservative to indulge in last wordism. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 15:35, 4 January 2015 (EST)
 
:: Quote <b>Right now, I think the odds are pretty much zero given your level of content creation</b>.  Doesn't mean SamHB is not right though.  The edits from the redoubt are so obviously either parody or highly biased POV pushing that it is difficult to argue otherwise.  Woo is not encyclopedic, no matter who peddles the woo.  Now I leave both redoubt and the collective known as User:Conservative to indulge in last wordism. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 15:35, 4 January 2015 (EST)
 
:::Oh, and if the collective editors of the User:conservative account have a long haired maiden as a sweetheart then I would question how multiple people having the same sweetheart is in any way Christian?  Seems more liberal hippy type behaviour to me.  [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 15:37, 4 January 2015 (EST)
 
:::Oh, and if the collective editors of the User:conservative account have a long haired maiden as a sweetheart then I would question how multiple people having the same sweetheart is in any way Christian?  Seems more liberal hippy type behaviour to me.  [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 15:37, 4 January 2015 (EST)
 +
::::DavidSpenceer, you may believe that deceitful accusations based on altering the meaning of other people's words is clever. It is not. And it makes the accuser look bad. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:15, 4 January 2015 (EST)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,621

edits