Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homosexuality"
(→Cleaning up: new section) |
(→Cleaning up) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
There are WAY too many sections and subsections on this page, I'm going to see if I can combine the major information and remove the subsections with little content to make the Table of Contents readable. There are actually sections with two sentences or less right now. That kind of material would be better left in subpages or just referred to in the See also section; perhaps mentioned briefly in another section. I'd like to clean up the page so it is more readable though. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 20:35, 25 January 2015 (EST) | There are WAY too many sections and subsections on this page, I'm going to see if I can combine the major information and remove the subsections with little content to make the Table of Contents readable. There are actually sections with two sentences or less right now. That kind of material would be better left in subpages or just referred to in the See also section; perhaps mentioned briefly in another section. I'd like to clean up the page so it is more readable though. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 20:35, 25 January 2015 (EST) | ||
| + | :[[User:Conservative]] I saw the page was recently protected. If you dislike the edits being made, can you tell me what exactly you disagreed with? --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 23:20, 25 January 2015 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:20, January 26, 2015
8 major identical twin studies demonstrate homosexuality is not genetic
Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way. http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/identical-twin-studies-prove-homosexuality-is-not-genetic Conservative 05:28, 15 January 2015 (EST)
Cleaning up
There are WAY too many sections and subsections on this page, I'm going to see if I can combine the major information and remove the subsections with little content to make the Table of Contents readable. There are actually sections with two sentences or less right now. That kind of material would be better left in subpages or just referred to in the See also section; perhaps mentioned briefly in another section. I'd like to clean up the page so it is more readable though. --Joshua Zambrano 20:35, 25 January 2015 (EST)
- User:Conservative I saw the page was recently protected. If you dislike the edits being made, can you tell me what exactly you disagreed with? --Joshua Zambrano 23:20, 25 January 2015 (EST)
