Changes

821 bytes added ,  22:39, December 3, 2015
The Living Constitution, by David A. Strauss
Line 21: Line 21:     
This 8 decades, nearly century-long lack of disclosure to the wider public leaves the impression that the idea is entirely new.
 
This 8 decades, nearly century-long lack of disclosure to the wider public leaves the impression that the idea is entirely new.
 +
 +
While many progressives disfavor openly using the phrase ''living constitution'', there are a handful who are defiant<ref name=tnralive>[https://newrepublic.com/article/75628/its-alive It's Alive], [[The New Republic]]</ref> with regard to keeping it in public view.  David A. Strauss,<ref>[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/strauss David A. Strauss]</ref> a professor of Law at [[Harvard]] who has argued 18 cases in front of the Supreme Court, defines the ''living constitution'' this way:
 +
<blockquote>A "''living constitution''" is one that evolves, changes over time, and adapts to new circumstances, without being formally amended.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=OYxoAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 The Living Constitution], by David A. Strauss, page 1</ref><ref name=tnralive /></blockquote>
    
===On the Court===
 
===On the Court===
Line 57: Line 60:  
* [[Roe v. Wade]]
 
* [[Roe v. Wade]]
 
* [[Evolving constitution]]
 
* [[Evolving constitution]]
 +
* [[Frank Johnson Goodnow]]
    
==References==
 
==References==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147

edits