Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 114:
Line 114: − +
→Relevance of Deism: first amendment
:::It sounds, my historically-minded friend, like the dispute is over the '''degree''' of religiosity amoung the founders; and over the extent to which the Founding was a Christian phenomenon or a secular one.
:::It sounds, my historically-minded friend, like the dispute is over the '''degree''' of religiosity amoung the founders; and over the extent to which the Founding was a Christian phenomenon or a secular one.
:::*Was the first amendment intented to help religious people practice their religion? Or primarily to '''restrict''' religious practice and exalt secularism? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:52, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:::*Was the [[first amendment]] intented to help religious people practice their religion? Or primarily to '''restrict''' religious practice and exalt secularism? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:52, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
==References==
==References==