Difference between revisions of "Open Question: Why Do evolutionists say 'science is all about making changes' yet don't even consider Biblical Creation as an alternative?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup, typos fixed: self correcting → self-correcting) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Why is it that [[evolution|evolutionists]] always tout the line 'science is a self correcting process' yet just downright deny any invocation of God? | + | Why is it that [[evolution|evolutionists]] always tout the line 'science is a self-correcting process' yet just downright deny any invocation of God? |
:Because God is, by definition, outside the scientific method. He isn't a variable that can be controlled, so the scientific method can't account for Him. --[[User:HenrikO|HenrikO]] 10:21, 12 October 2011 (EDT) | :Because God is, by definition, outside the scientific method. He isn't a variable that can be controlled, so the scientific method can't account for Him. --[[User:HenrikO|HenrikO]] 10:21, 12 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
[[Category:Evolution]] | [[Category:Evolution]] | ||
[[Category:Creationism]] | [[Category:Creationism]] | ||
[[Category:Debate]] | [[Category:Debate]] | ||
Revision as of 15:17, July 1, 2016
Why is it that evolutionists always tout the line 'science is a self-correcting process' yet just downright deny any invocation of God?
- Because God is, by definition, outside the scientific method. He isn't a variable that can be controlled, so the scientific method can't account for Him. --HenrikO 10:21, 12 October 2011 (EDT)