Difference between revisions of "New Scientist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (a giant template doesn't fit on a small article - either request that specific statements be checked or don't contest) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→External links: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It does not publish anything critical of the [[theory of evolution]] nor does it publish anything regarding [[intelligent design]] in a positive light. It also supports the theory of anthropogenic [[climate change]], and in a piece in its 18 October issue, it contained an article criticising [[supply-side economics]]. | It does not publish anything critical of the [[theory of evolution]] nor does it publish anything regarding [[intelligent design]] in a positive light. It also supports the theory of anthropogenic [[climate change]], and in a piece in its 18 October issue, it contained an article criticising [[supply-side economics]]. | ||
| − | ==External | + | ==External links== |
| − | [http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns New Scientist Homepage] | + | * [http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns New Scientist Homepage] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Magazines]] |
Latest revision as of 06:07, July 12, 2016
New Scientist is a weekly British science magazine that reports on a wide range of news and developments in science and technology. It was first published in 1956 and in September 2006 reported having a circulation of about 170,000 worldwide.
It does not publish anything critical of the theory of evolution nor does it publish anything regarding intelligent design in a positive light. It also supports the theory of anthropogenic climate change, and in a piece in its 18 October issue, it contained an article criticising supply-side economics.