Difference between revisions of "Talk:Harvard abortion study"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(link to the study) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
How about a link to the actual study so we can draw our own conclusions instead of reading Andy's slanted opinions? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | How about a link to the actual study so we can draw our own conclusions instead of reading Andy's slanted opinions? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Here's the NY Times's spin on it: [http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Abortion-Cancer.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:11, April 24, 2007
Wow. This article reaches levels of ridiculousness I thought were unobtainable. ColinRtalk 12:54, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Colin, I almost blocked your account for that remark. This is a serious effort and I suggest you baseless attack before I have to.--Aschlafly 13:09, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Assuming you mean the original article reporting the study, I agree completely. Rarely have a seen a more blatant example of junk science. You can't exclude people who die of breast cancer, from a study on breast cancer! --Ed Poor 13:06, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
How about a link to the actual study so we can draw our own conclusions instead of reading Andy's slanted opinions? Jrssr5 13:08, 24 April 2007 (EDT)