SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
mLine 392:
Line 392: − +
→User:Dimetrodont
*The cited Wikipedia article clearly states that mammals are '''not''' descended from dimetrodon. This person's crime was not in saying that they are, but in citing an article while making a claim about what the article says, when the article actually says the opposite. This practice is not that uncommon at Conservapedia. I've seen it a number of times. Usually it's just taking something out of context in a misleading way. But occasionally it's blatant falsehood such as this.
*The cited Wikipedia article clearly states that mammals are '''not''' descended from dimetrodon. This person's crime was not in saying that they are, but in citing an article while making a claim about what the article says, when the article actually says the opposite. This practice is not that uncommon at Conservapedia. I've seen it a number of times. Usually it's just taking something out of context in a misleading way. But occasionally it's blatant falsehood such as this.
*You should try not to overuse phrases like "incorrect liberal info". I frequently see the term "liberal" applied to things that have nothing to do with liberalism or politics. Whether mammals are descended from dimetrodons (they aren't) is a matter of science, not politics. It happens that acceptance of evolution is probably higher among liberals than among conservatives, but that doesn't make evolution a "liberal theory" any more than relativity is.
*You should try not to overuse phrases like "incorrect liberal info". I frequently see the term "liberal" applied to things that have nothing to do with liberalism or politics. Whether mammals are descended from dimetrodons (they aren't) is a matter of science, not politics. It happens that acceptance of evolution is probably higher among liberals than among conservatives, but that doesn't make evolution a "liberal theory" any more than relativity is.
*This person was blocked, back in 2008, by our friend the [[Conservapedia:Guard dog]].
*This person was blocked, back in 2008, by our friend the [[Conservapedia:Guard dog]]. It didn't look at the content, of course, but it noticed that he made 13 edits in 18 minutes.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:52, 4 September 2016 (EDT)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 10:52, 4 September 2016 (EDT)