Difference between revisions of "Promiscuity"
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (clean up & uniformity) |
(Promiscuity & LGBTI agenda) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* {{anti-abstinence campaign}} | * {{anti-abstinence campaign}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Promiscuity as part of [[Gay agenda|LGBTI agenda]]== | ||
| + | Promiscuity is advocated by LGBTI/gay propagandists.<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Romance |author=Dan Savage & Esther Perel; moderated by Logan Ury |publisher=Talks at Google |place=New York & Mountain View |date=22 Jan 2016|pages=6min:22sec |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7E9ASb3LfE&feature=youtu.be |accessdate=27 Nov 2016 |quote=The video contains language not suitable for some audiences. Viewer discretion is advised. ..."you can be in love and you can still f[*]k other people...In most of history monogamy was one person for life, and at this moment monogamy is one person at the time" }}</ref> Homosexuals, especially male, are not promiscuous because of "internalized [[Gleichschaltung#Homophobia|homophobia]]", or laws banning same-sex "marriage", but because when given the choice, they overwhelmingly choose to be promiscuous. Wrecking the fundamental social building block of [[civilization]], [[family]], is not going to change it. Substitute sex dominating the promiscuous gay culture indicates the absence of love altogehter, as one does not relate to the other as a person, but as an object. It is dehumanized and dehumanizing, it treats other human being as a mere appurtenance to one's desires. According to American composer Ned Rorem, the anonymous sex could never be repeated with the same person, "precisely because the next time he would be a person." [[Aristotle]] criticized treating other person as object in his ''Ethics'' where he wrote: ''"Those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves, and not in so far as the other is the person loved."''<ref name="Reilly2014">{{cite book |title=Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything |author=Robert R. Reilly |publisher=Ignatius Press |place=San Francisco |pages=62-4 |isbn=978-1-58617-833-8 |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-JTobNH80}}</ref> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[Adultery]] | * [[Adultery]] | ||
| + | * [[Destroying the family]] | ||
* [[Sexual immorality]] | * [[Sexual immorality]] | ||
* [[Immorality]] | * [[Immorality]] | ||
Revision as of 08:33, November 27, 2016
Promiscuity is a form of sexual immorality involving indiscriminate or multiple sexual relationships. Hollywood movies have a tendency to promote promiscuity more than family values. Promiscuity is also wildly practiced by the homosexual population (see Homosexuality and Promiscuity). The practice of promiscuity brings about a vastly increased risk of disease and premature death.
- An effective propaganda campaign against abstinence-centered education has been conducted since 2004 with most of the mass media displaying a docile willingness to transmit whatever is written on the latest press release of “experts” whose agendas and biases are not examined even in the most cursory manner.[1]
Promiscuity as part of LGBTI agenda
Promiscuity is advocated by LGBTI/gay propagandists.[2] Homosexuals, especially male, are not promiscuous because of "internalized homophobia", or laws banning same-sex "marriage", but because when given the choice, they overwhelmingly choose to be promiscuous. Wrecking the fundamental social building block of civilization, family, is not going to change it. Substitute sex dominating the promiscuous gay culture indicates the absence of love altogehter, as one does not relate to the other as a person, but as an object. It is dehumanized and dehumanizing, it treats other human being as a mere appurtenance to one's desires. According to American composer Ned Rorem, the anonymous sex could never be repeated with the same person, "precisely because the next time he would be a person." Aristotle criticized treating other person as object in his Ethics where he wrote: "Those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves, and not in so far as the other is the person loved."[3]
See also
- Adultery
- Destroying the family
- Sexual immorality
- Immorality
- Morality
- Moral degeneration
- Moral relativism
- Amoral
- Essay:Immorality in America
- Moral degeneration
- Abortion - Abortion and promiscuity
- Promiscuity versus Chastity, Purity, Celibacy
- Christianity in Conservapedia
- Bioethics
- Cause and effect
- Ten Commandments
- Five Precepts
- Values
versus:
References
- ↑ The War on Intimacy, Chapter 20
- ↑ Dan Savage & Esther Perel; moderated by Logan Ury (22 Jan 2016). Modern Romance 6min:22sec. Talks at Google. Retrieved on 27 Nov 2016. “The video contains language not suitable for some audiences. Viewer discretion is advised. ..."you can be in love and you can still f[*]k other people...In most of history monogamy was one person for life, and at this moment monogamy is one person at the time"”
- ↑ Robert R. Reilly. Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything. Ignatius Press, 62-4. ISBN 978-1-58617-833-8.