Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,498
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 00:50, May 15, 2021
, 00:50, May 15, 2021→Discussion for a possible new Wikipedia Article: two cents
:::If Wikipedia is suppressing well-researched work by an editor, properly sourced with external links, we want that work (generally in most cases). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 18:38, 14 May 2021 (EDT)
:::If Wikipedia is suppressing well-researched work by an editor, properly sourced with external links, we want that work (generally in most cases). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 18:38, 14 May 2021 (EDT)
::::Yeah. That is good advice. I will wait for a day or so to let a few other people drop their opinions. But that is a really good idea. --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 19:30, 14 May 2021 (EDT)
::::Yeah. That is good advice. I will wait for a day or so to let a few other people drop their opinions. But that is a really good idea. --[[User:Elijahandskip|Elijahandskip]] ([[User talk:Elijahandskip|talk]]) 19:30, 14 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::It sounds good in theory, at least. I don't want us to just become "anti-Wikipedia" though, but rather a place where discussion like that isn't stifled. Rob is right to point out those examples...the Seth Rich article in particular stands out to me, because that information was heavily suppressed on numerous platforms. When our page went up, there seemed to be a lot of interest. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 20:50, 14 May 2021 (EDT)