Difference between revisions of "Talk:Victoria"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I was making a comment, that was all. Little Tassie tends to get left off maps, ignored by the "national" paper and generally considered the runt of the litter (which it probably is). [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 05:30, 27 May 2007 (EDT) | I was making a comment, that was all. Little Tassie tends to get left off maps, ignored by the "national" paper and generally considered the runt of the litter (which it probably is). [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 05:30, 27 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
I was actually going to change it when I got back from being the family taxi., but thanks.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 05:31, 27 May 2007 (EDT) | I was actually going to change it when I got back from being the family taxi., but thanks.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 05:31, 27 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :My original reason for not including it was simply that the land border is insignificant. The "mainland" shows that I remembered Tasmania is also in the southeast of the country. No matter. Anything else to add? --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 05:43, 27 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:43, May 27, 2007
And poor little Tasmania, ignored as usual, is across Bass Strait to the south.AlanE 02:47, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
- This article is not locked - you could have added it yourself. --Scott 04:42, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
I was making a comment, that was all. Little Tassie tends to get left off maps, ignored by the "national" paper and generally considered the runt of the litter (which it probably is). AlanE 05:30, 27 May 2007 (EDT) I was actually going to change it when I got back from being the family taxi., but thanks.AlanE 05:31, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
- My original reason for not including it was simply that the land border is insignificant. The "mainland" shows that I remembered Tasmania is also in the southeast of the country. No matter. Anything else to add? --Scott 05:43, 27 May 2007 (EDT)