Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/technology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 81: Line 81:
  
 
"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[https://www.dyeager.org/2008/04/probability-evolution.html]
 
"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[https://www.dyeager.org/2008/04/probability-evolution.html]
 +
 +
== Innovation and Scientific progress not as effective as it used to be ==
 +
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jX07zPupNdc Peter Thiel and Andy Kessler on the state of technology and innovation]
 +
 +
*[https://evolutionnews.org/2023/01/is-the-end-of-science-near/ Is the End of Science Near?]

Revision as of 16:10, January 16, 2023

Innovation

Innovation articles:

Changing face of workplace

Droids:

Robotics:

Robots and economic process of creative destruction:

Robots and repetitive jobs:

Problems with modern scientific community

Scientific community and science publications

Social science literature has major problems

Environmental science

Military technology

SR-71 Blackbird:

Apache helicopters and helicopter gunships:

Creation vs. evolution

"The one in 1068 is the probability of calling out each card — in order — as you turn them up. That’s the correct analogy between cards and evolution. It’s a certainty you will get a sequence. But is it the exact sequence you want? Correct math, wrong application. The probability is 1 you will get a sequence, but much less likely you could correctly call out each card as it’s dealt (This is also sometimes illustrated as a group of monkeys randomly typing out the works of Shakespeare)."[1]

Innovation and Scientific progress not as effective as it used to be