Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,900
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: − +
→Regarding locking the page: Comments from Admin/SYSOP with the username Conservative
2. I looked at the evolutionists versions and there were many statements uncited by footnotes.
2. I looked at the evolutionists versions and there were many statements uncited by footnotes.
3. I have looked at Ray Martinez's work in the past and I know that he can produce good work. However, I looked at Ray Martinez's version briefly and immediately ran across unencyclopedic language. For example, I found this unencyclopedic: A critical view of Darwinists '''in sheeps clothing''' I also think you should have used footnotes instead of a bibliography since the evo/creo issue can be contentious.
3. I have looked at creationists Ray Martinez's work in the past and I know that he can produce good work. However, I looked at Ray Martinez's version briefly and immediately ran across unencyclopedic language. For example, I found this unencyclopedic: A critical view of Darwinists '''in sheeps clothing''' I also think you should have used footnotes instead of a bibliography since the evo/creo issue can be contentious.
4. I don't think theistic evolution should be such a contentious issue as far as what it is if you stick to the facts. I suggest the two diametrically opposed sides stick to the facts and scrupuously footnote this article since it is becoming contentious.
4. I don't think theistic evolution should be such a contentious issue as far as what it is if you stick to the facts. I suggest the two diametrically opposed sides stick to the facts and scrupuously footnote this article since it is becoming contentious.