Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,884
edits
Changes
→Summary of Deepseek's analysis
:::::Take a look at this article: [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-multimodel-writing-pipeline-how.html The Multi‑Model Writing Pipeline: How Different AIs Excel at Different Cognitive Jobs]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:30, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
:::::Take a look at this article: [https://efficiencyandmanagement.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-multimodel-writing-pipeline-how.html The Multi‑Model Writing Pipeline: How Different AIs Excel at Different Cognitive Jobs]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:30, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
::::::Another point: I have noticed that when a person engages in [[motivated reasoning]] an AI often can beat them in terms providing superior information. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:56, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
::::::Another point: I have noticed that when a person engages in [[motivated reasoning]] an AI often can beat them in terms providing superior information. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:56, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
===Take a look at the false premises [[User:Conservative inputs in AI===
RobSmith never 'praised' Deepseek. RobSmith is not any kind of an expert to compare one AI system with another, nor has he ever used Deepseek. RobSmith simply added a link from the [[US Department of Defense]] to refute [[User:Conservative]]'s [[racist]] & [[deceptive]] Essay that [[China]] was incapable of [[innovation]]. ''' [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Communist_China%E2%80%99s_quixotic_quest_to_innovate:_A_statist_economy_can%E2%80%99t_make_creativity_greatly_blossom See talk]
==Blanked pages and Karajou's bird content==
==Blanked pages and Karajou's bird content==