Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,175 bytes added ,  16:32, August 2, 2007
→‎Earnings: response
Line 137: Line 137:  
:::::::The basis of modern economics is based on each person's desire to increase their own wealth. The theory goes on to state that actions to benefit oneself, in a free market, can often result in benefit in others (as seen in basic examples of trade). Whether you classify that as "greed" is your problem. Would you say Warren Buffett is "greedy" throughout his career? Or Bill Gates?
 
:::::::The basis of modern economics is based on each person's desire to increase their own wealth. The theory goes on to state that actions to benefit oneself, in a free market, can often result in benefit in others (as seen in basic examples of trade). Whether you classify that as "greed" is your problem. Would you say Warren Buffett is "greedy" throughout his career? Or Bill Gates?
 
:::::::I'm sorry but if there's a further lack of rational objections (read: intellectual response), I'm going to replace the word "bilk" in the article. "Bilk" includes a negative connotation that is subjective to the author, and its inclusion creates a bias in the article (not that you guys worry about it here in Conservapedia). [[User:ATang|ATang]] 10:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::::I'm sorry but if there's a further lack of rational objections (read: intellectual response), I'm going to replace the word "bilk" in the article. "Bilk" includes a negative connotation that is subjective to the author, and its inclusion creates a bias in the article (not that you guys worry about it here in Conservapedia). [[User:ATang|ATang]] 10:57, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
::::::::using "artistic" and "Hollywood" in the same sentence is kinda oxymoronic, isn't it?
 +
:::::::::''The basis of modern economics is based on each person's desire to increase their own wealth.''
 +
::::::::IOW, self interest, or greed.  This was [[Cain]]'s problem, was it not, when he murdered [[Abel]].  So this idea is hardly "modern."
 +
::::::::So you're argument is that commiting fraud & slander somehow benefits the free market and furthers economic progress.  I may take a different view, of course, beleiving that to stop such things is why we have police, courts, and regulation.  And of course morality cannot be legislated, so there is also a question of self-policing ethical standards.  You seem to be arguing that slander & fraud somehow can be tolerated as artistic (or as Moore might argue journalistic) license.  This is all debating what the meaning of is "is."  That's fine with me, let's continue debating what the meaning of "bilked" is then, since there's a big gapping hole whether Moore's life's opus is "art" or "journalism."  Right now, there seems to be a wide general concensus it is "schlock."  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 12:32, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,495

edits

Navigation menu