Difference between revisions of "Sufficient condition"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(cat)
m (undead end)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A '''sufficient condition''' is one for which the following is true:
 
A '''sufficient condition''' is one for which the following is true:
 
: If A is a sufficient condition of B, then if A is true, B ''must'' be true.
 
: If A is a sufficient condition of B, then if A is true, B ''must'' be true.
−
For example, "I heard thunder" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there ''must'' have been lightning nearby to cause it.
+
For example, "I heard [[thunder]]" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there ''must'' have been [[lightning]] nearby to cause it.
 
However, "There was lightning nearby" is ''not'' a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.
 
However, "There was lightning nearby" is ''not'' a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.
  
 
[[Category:Logic]]
 
[[Category:Logic]]

Revision as of 23:45, November 1, 2007

A sufficient condition is one for which the following is true:

If A is a sufficient condition of B, then if A is true, B must be true.

For example, "I heard thunder" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there must have been lightning nearby to cause it. However, "There was lightning nearby" is not a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.