Difference between revisions of "Fermat's Last Theorem"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Edited for a little information, removed unreasonable doubt about the proof (it has undergone rather a *lot* of scrutiny, actually))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem was suggested by the French mathematician [[Pierre de Fermat]].  He said he had proved this problem but that there was not enough room in the margin to state his proof.  He then died before anyone could obtain his proof.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem was suggested by the French mathematician [[Pierre de Fermat]].  He said he had proved this problem but that there was not enough room in the margin to state his proof.  He then died before anyone could obtain his proof.
  
−
This problem has confounded mathematicians for centuries, and there still is no proof for it using [[elementary techniques]].  Most doubt that Fermat was able to prove it himself.
+
This problem has confounded mathematicians for centuries, and there still is no proof for it using [[elementary techniques]].  Most doubt that Fermat was able to prove it himself, as evidenced by the fact that he later proved the n = 4 case separately.
  
 
The theorem is as follows:
 
The theorem is as follows:
  
−
For integers n > 2, there are no non-integral solutions to: x<sup>n</sup>+y<sup>n</sup>=z<sup>n</sup>
+
For integers n > 2, there are no integral solutions to: x<sup>n</sup> + y<sup>n</sup> = z<sup>n</sup>
  
−
In a series of lectures in 1993, mathematician [[Andrew Wiles]] claimed to have secretly proved this using non-elementary techniques.  Critics pointed out a flaw in his proof, however.  Wiles spent a year trying to fix the flaw, and in September 1994 announecd a new version of the proof that was largely accepted by the mathematical community, though it is unclear how much independent verification it received.  Many mathematicians accept the proof without fully understanding it, and there has been remarkably little improvements or explanations since 1994.
+
In a series of lectures in 1993, mathematician [[Andrew Wiles]] claimed to have proved this using techniques in algebraic geometry.  Critics pointed out a flaw in his proof, however.  Wiles spent a year trying to fix the flaw, and in September 1994, he and Richard Taylor announced a new version of the proof that was largely accepted by the mathematical community.   
  
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 
[[Category:Mathematics]]

Revision as of 00:14, March 14, 2007

Fermat's Last Theorem was suggested by the French mathematician Pierre de Fermat. He said he had proved this problem but that there was not enough room in the margin to state his proof. He then died before anyone could obtain his proof.

This problem has confounded mathematicians for centuries, and there still is no proof for it using elementary techniques. Most doubt that Fermat was able to prove it himself, as evidenced by the fact that he later proved the n = 4 case separately.

The theorem is as follows:

For integers n > 2, there are no integral solutions to: xn + yn = zn

In a series of lectures in 1993, mathematician Andrew Wiles claimed to have proved this using techniques in algebraic geometry. Critics pointed out a flaw in his proof, however. Wiles spent a year trying to fix the flaw, and in September 1994, he and Richard Taylor announced a new version of the proof that was largely accepted by the mathematical community.