Difference between revisions of "Alexander v. Choate"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: In ''Alexander v. Choate'', 469 U.S. 287, 293 (1985), the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Title VI [of the Civil Rights Act of 1954] itself directly reaches only instances of intentional...)
 
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In ''Alexander v. Choate'', 469 U.S. 287, 293 (1985), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that "Title VI [of the Civil Rights Act of 1954] itself directly reaches only instances of intentional discrimination."
 
  
−
Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]] wrote the opinion for the unanimous court.  The facts arose from Tennessee proposed reducing the number of annual days of inpatient hospital care covered by its state Medicaid program. The question presented was whether the effect upon the handicapped that this reduction will have is cognizable under § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or its implementing regulations. The Court held that it is not.
 
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 

Revision as of 02:06, November 12, 2007

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Alexander_v._Choate&oldid=332044"