Difference between revisions of "Talk:Private property"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I also deleted a couple of sentences that erroneously suggested that private property cannot be held by more than one person.  In fact, there are several kinds of joint property recognized in Anglo-American law.  I suspect the author meant to distinguish private ownership from, for example, nationalized property, which, in theory, is owned by the public at large, which, of course, is a valid distinction, but the statement as written was inaccurate.  [[User:QBeam]] 3:45 EST, Nov. 19, 2007
 
I also deleted a couple of sentences that erroneously suggested that private property cannot be held by more than one person.  In fact, there are several kinds of joint property recognized in Anglo-American law.  I suspect the author meant to distinguish private ownership from, for example, nationalized property, which, in theory, is owned by the public at large, which, of course, is a valid distinction, but the statement as written was inaccurate.  [[User:QBeam]] 3:45 EST, Nov. 19, 2007
  
−
: Oops, I just realized that my cut-and-pasting didn't copy in the footnotes.  I'm out of time at this minute, but I'll add them shortly...bear with me.  3:50 EST, Nov. 19, 2007
+
: Oops, I just realized that my cut-and-pasting didn't copy in the footnotes.  I'm out of time at this minute, but I'll add them shortly...bear with me.  [[User:QBeam]] 3:50 EST, Nov. 19, 2007

Revision as of 20:48, November 19, 2007

I've added a definition section, and a significant section on the purpose of private property. This is my first attempt at creating what is substantially an entire article from whole cloth, and so I expect it can benefit from a great deal of constructive criticism. In particular, I'm working to develop citations, which are skeletal at best, at present. (Most of this is material I learned during the course of my own education in economics and the law--it's pretty fundamental stuff, and so not the kind you'd generally attribute to any particular source.)

I also deleted a couple of sentences that erroneously suggested that private property cannot be held by more than one person. In fact, there are several kinds of joint property recognized in Anglo-American law. I suspect the author meant to distinguish private ownership from, for example, nationalized property, which, in theory, is owned by the public at large, which, of course, is a valid distinction, but the statement as written was inaccurate. User:QBeam 3:45 EST, Nov. 19, 2007

Oops, I just realized that my cut-and-pasting didn't copy in the footnotes. I'm out of time at this minute, but I'll add them shortly...bear with me. User:QBeam 3:50 EST, Nov. 19, 2007