Changes

531 bytes added ,  01:52, March 15, 2007
How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact?
Line 1: Line 1:  
This definition isn't consistent with other usage here, since other pages refer to the "Theory of Evolution" for example.  Or look at [[Global warming]] which talks about "The theory that we are currently in a period of rapid climate change consisting of increasing temperature".  But the definition of "Theory" here is "A hypothesis that has been tested with a significant amount of data,[1] for which a sufficient amount of evidence (and a lack of disconfirming evidence) has been found that it would be perverse to withhold assent."  So to call global warming a "theory" in this sense would be to say that it would be perverse not to agree!  Something wrong here .... [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 02:14, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 
This definition isn't consistent with other usage here, since other pages refer to the "Theory of Evolution" for example.  Or look at [[Global warming]] which talks about "The theory that we are currently in a period of rapid climate change consisting of increasing temperature".  But the definition of "Theory" here is "A hypothesis that has been tested with a significant amount of data,[1] for which a sufficient amount of evidence (and a lack of disconfirming evidence) has been found that it would be perverse to withhold assent."  So to call global warming a "theory" in this sense would be to say that it would be perverse not to agree!  Something wrong here .... [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 02:14, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
== How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact? ==
 +
 +
This very website has been popularly quoted because it accepts the true, Biblical origin of species on this planet. If this really is a conservative knowledgebase, is it not reasonable to present the conservative view on a subject, given that there are many reputable conservative creation scientists that agree with my work as I presented it? My edit should be reinstated, in line with the philosophy of this website.