412
edits
Changes
mLine 4:
Line 4: + + +
→How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact?
This very website has been popularly quoted because it accepts the true, Biblical origin of species on this planet. If this really is a conservative knowledgebase, is it not reasonable to present the conservative view on a subject, given that there are many reputable conservative creation scientists that agree with my work as I presented it? My edit should be reinstated, in line with the philosophy of this website.--[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 21:52, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
This very website has been popularly quoted because it accepts the true, Biblical origin of species on this planet. If this really is a conservative knowledgebase, is it not reasonable to present the conservative view on a subject, given that there are many reputable conservative creation scientists that agree with my work as I presented it? My edit should be reinstated, in line with the philosophy of this website.--[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 21:52, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
:Now, now, play nice, [[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] and [[User:ColinR|ColinR]].
::::: [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 22:04, 14 March 2007 (EDT)