Difference between revisions of "Archaeopteryx"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (This article is about a fossil, not evolution. Removed text emphasizing evolution.)
(No difference)

Revision as of 04:42, March 15, 2007

Archaeopteryx is a fossil form based on fragments. It is often presented as evidence of evolution because the bones have some characteristics reminiscent of reptiles, making it appear to be a transitional form between reptiles and birds.


The criticism of the Archaeopteryx as a transitional form, has been strengthened by the work of anatomist Dr. David Menton[1] suggesting that Archaeopteryx was a true bird with flight feathers, not a transitional form at all.
In 1993, an article was published in Science magazine arguing that the Archaeopteryx had fully formed flying feathers (including asymmetric vanes and ventral, reinforcing furrows as in modern flying birds), the classical elliptical wings of modem woodland birds, and a large wishbone for attachment of muscles responsible for the downstroke of the wings[1]
Subsequently, in 1994, a publication doubting evolution explained that the Archaeopteryx was essentially that of a flying bird, with a large cerebellum and visual cortex. The fact that it had teeth is irrelevant to its alleged transitional status -- a number of extinct birds had teeth, while many reptiles do not. Furthermore, like other birds, both its maxilla (upper jaw) and mandible (lower jaw) moved. In most vertebrates, including reptiles, only the mandible moves.[2]

References

  1. ↑ A. Feduccia, "Evidence from Claw Geometry Indicating Arboreal Habits of Archaeopteryx," Science, 259(5096):790-793, February 5, 1993.
  2. ↑ D. Mentonand C. Wieland, "Bird Evolution Flies out the window," Creation Ex Nihilo, 16(4):16-19, September-November 1994.