Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Food for thought: No, and it is.
Line 37: Line 37:  
:: But the evidence that Christianity and other theistic religions touts is the complexity of design. As a (pseudo) Theistic religion, the Spagetti monster can inherit the same evidence. I have never heard any evidence of one religion being true over another. One can argue from evidence that there is a creator, but which creator you happen to choose from is a matter of faith. This is why the spagetti monster can be said to be as plausable as Allah, Yawheh or the great JuJu under the sea. Mark Hayward (14:34), 23 January 2008 (GMT)
 
:: But the evidence that Christianity and other theistic religions touts is the complexity of design. As a (pseudo) Theistic religion, the Spagetti monster can inherit the same evidence. I have never heard any evidence of one religion being true over another. One can argue from evidence that there is a creator, but which creator you happen to choose from is a matter of faith. This is why the spagetti monster can be said to be as plausable as Allah, Yawheh or the great JuJu under the sea. Mark Hayward (14:34), 23 January 2008 (GMT)
 
::: Complexity of design is ''one'' area of evidence that Christianity uses; it is not the sum total of evidence.  Before you set about critiquing religions that you know next to nothing about, it's a good idea to learn about the topic that you are critiquing; else all you achieve is displaying your ignorance.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
 
::: Complexity of design is ''one'' area of evidence that Christianity uses; it is not the sum total of evidence.  Before you set about critiquing religions that you know next to nothing about, it's a good idea to learn about the topic that you are critiquing; else all you achieve is displaying your ignorance.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
:::: Care to present any? It is not enough for you to simply assert it.
+
:::: Care to present any? It is not enough for you to simply assert it. {{unsigned|Mcai9mh3}}
 +
::::: Why not?  That's all you did.  And no, I don't particularly care to present any.  Not for somebody who criticises something that he knows next to nothing about.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:00, 24 January 2008 (EST)
 
:::There is a great deal of evidence to support the "claims" of Christianity, as well as a 2000 year history, as opposed to a recently made up mockery of religion.  It's not equivalent.[[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 20:47, 23 January 2008 (EST)
 
:::There is a great deal of evidence to support the "claims" of Christianity, as well as a 2000 year history, as opposed to a recently made up mockery of religion.  It's not equivalent.[[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 20:47, 23 January 2008 (EST)
:::: Longevity is not evidence. There are older beleifs and religions than christianity.
+
:::: Longevity is not evidence. There are older beleifs and religions than christianity. {{unsigned|Mcai9mh3}}
 +
::::: That depends on how you look at it, but it ''is'' evidence of a sort.  See [http://www.tektonics.org/lp/nowayjose.html here].  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:00, 24 January 2008 (EST)
    
==FSM and ID criticism==
 
==FSM and ID criticism==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu