Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 32: Line 32:     
The rational for the Flying Spagetti Monster is as follows:
 
The rational for the Flying Spagetti Monster is as follows:
There is equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs, therefore the likelihood of the spagetti monster is equal to that of any God. If you ridicule the belief in the spagetti monster then you have to apply the same ridicule to all other religous beleifs.
+
There is equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs, therefore the likelihood of the spagetti monster is equal to that of any God. If you ridicule the belief in the spagetti monster then you have to apply the same ridicule to all other religous beleifs. {{unsigned|Mcai9mh3}}
 
: That might be the rationale, but that rationale depends on the ''presumption'' that there ''is'' "equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs(sic)".  As a Christian, I totally reject that presumption, therefore if I do ridicule belief in the spaghetti monster, it does not follow that I have to apply the same ridicule to other beliefs.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
 
: That might be the rationale, but that rationale depends on the ''presumption'' that there ''is'' "equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs(sic)".  As a Christian, I totally reject that presumption, therefore if I do ridicule belief in the spaghetti monster, it does not follow that I have to apply the same ridicule to other beliefs.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
  
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu