Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal logic"
Feebasfactor (talk | contribs) (→"except the conservative truth": well it's definitely not conservative enough) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I wonder if anyone would agree that reverting my edit from reading "conservative views" to reading "conservative truth," and thereby implying that "conservatism = THE TRUTH" can be interpreted in light of items 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, and 19 of the [[extremism]] article.[[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 17:34, 16 February 2008 (EST) | I wonder if anyone would agree that reverting my edit from reading "conservative views" to reading "conservative truth," and thereby implying that "conservatism = THE TRUTH" can be interpreted in light of items 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, and 19 of the [[extremism]] article.[[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 17:34, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
:I'd say that article probably needs to be fixed for "[[liberal bias]]" anyway. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:42, 16 February 2008 (EST) | :I'd say that article probably needs to be fixed for "[[liberal bias]]" anyway. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 18:42, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::ROFLMAO! [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 18:43, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 23:43, February 16, 2008
that new laws reducing the gun ownership rate by 0.1% and a subsequent election of a left wing government are not linked
What on earth is this tripe supposed to mean? If gun ownership had not been reduced by 0.1% a left wing government (where? how?) would not have been elected? How? By the 0.1% blockading the polling stations with their weaponry? Or is some other 'reason' bubbling away in the peculiar mind of whoever came up with such an argument? Sawneybeane 16:20, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- It's obvious. -- Ferret Nice old chat 17:13, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- "...the largely defensive weapon of gun..." I liked that actually! Feebasfactor 16:55, 15 February 2008 (EST)
"except the conservative truth"
I wonder if anyone would agree that reverting my edit from reading "conservative views" to reading "conservative truth," and thereby implying that "conservatism = THE TRUTH" can be interpreted in light of items 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, and 19 of the extremism article.Rodney 17:34, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- I'd say that article probably needs to be fixed for "liberal bias" anyway. Feebasfactor 18:42, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- ROFLMAO! Rodney 18:43, 16 February 2008 (EST)