Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abortionist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Let's just pause for a minute: reply) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::: We're describing [[abortion]] today, and I don't agree with you about its history but there is no reason to waste time on it. | ::: We're describing [[abortion]] today, and I don't agree with you about its history but there is no reason to waste time on it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::: Unless we want produce an accurate article. Furthermore, the fact that a person gets paid is irrelevant. Are you suggesting that every job described here should include the phrase "and profits from"? --[[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 20:32, 23 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:32, February 24, 2008
Let's just pause for a minute
Shall we have a discussion rather than an edit war? --HMayo 20:14, 23 February 2008 (EST)
It is inaccurate to say that an abortionist is someone who necessarily profits from abortion. It might well usually be so but it not necessarily so. --HMayo 20:18, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- It's factual. Abortion is a profitable business, and there are no volunteer abortionists.--Aschlafly 20:22, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- I understand that. But it has not always been so. Abortion has a long history and the procedure has not always been in the hands of trained (and paid) medical professionals. --HMayo 20:28, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- We're describing abortion today, and I don't agree with you about its history but there is no reason to waste time on it.
- Unless we want produce an accurate article. Furthermore, the fact that a person gets paid is irrelevant. Are you suggesting that every job described here should include the phrase "and profits from"? --HMayo 20:32, 23 February 2008 (EST)