Difference between revisions of "Talk:Internet Relay Chat"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chevrefuqae (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think Conservapedia is working just fine as it is. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:05, 26 February 2008 (EST) | :I think Conservapedia is working just fine as it is. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:05, 26 February 2008 (EST) | ||
::Being content with the status quo is ''so'' 20th century conservatism. Can't we show the world we're a new, dynamic force that isn't going to bow to lib pressure? [[User:Chevrefuqae|Chevrefuqae]] 22:07, 26 February 2008 (EST) | ::Being content with the status quo is ''so'' 20th century conservatism. Can't we show the world we're a new, dynamic force that isn't going to bow to lib pressure? [[User:Chevrefuqae|Chevrefuqae]] 22:07, 26 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :::IRC is what's 20th century. I've spent so much time trying to figure out how to use it and just can't do it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:13, 26 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 03:13, February 27, 2008
I think that we need to get more contributors on the Conservapedia IRC channel. It makes the Wiki work alot more smoothly. Chevrefuqae 22:02, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- I think Conservapedia is working just fine as it is. DanH 22:05, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- Being content with the status quo is so 20th century conservatism. Can't we show the world we're a new, dynamic force that isn't going to bow to lib pressure? Chevrefuqae 22:07, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- IRC is what's 20th century. I've spent so much time trying to figure out how to use it and just can't do it. DanH 22:13, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- Being content with the status quo is so 20th century conservatism. Can't we show the world we're a new, dynamic force that isn't going to bow to lib pressure? Chevrefuqae 22:07, 26 February 2008 (EST)