Difference between revisions of "People for the American Way"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(improved) |
m (copyedit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''People for the American Way''' is a [[left-wing]] advocacy group <ref>Even as PFAW holds fast to its "non-partisan" tag, the [[Capital Research Center]] reported that, in 2003 and 2004, 98 percent of the organization's political contributions went to left-liberal [[Democratic]] candidates.[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6400]</ref> created by [[Norman Lear]], the wealthy producer of "All in Family," which was a [[liberal]] satire of a bigoted father named Archie Bunker and his dimwitted | + | '''People for the American Way''' is a [[left-wing]] advocacy group <ref>Even as PFAW holds fast to its "non-partisan" tag, the [[Capital Research Center]] reported that, in 2003 and 2004, 98 percent of the organization's political contributions went to left-liberal [[Democratic]] candidates.[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6400]</ref> created by [[Norman Lear]], the wealthy producer of "All in the Family," which was a [[liberal]] satire of a bigoted father named Archie Bunker and his dimwitted wife. |
In a familiar [[liberal style]], PAW pretends to represent the "American Way"<ref>[http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=22838]</ref> when in fact it spends its tax-deductible dollars in attempting to smear [[conservatives]]. | In a familiar [[liberal style]], PAW pretends to represent the "American Way"<ref>[http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=22838]</ref> when in fact it spends its tax-deductible dollars in attempting to smear [[conservatives]]. | ||
Revision as of 23:46, February 28, 2008
People for the American Way is a left-wing advocacy group [1] created by Norman Lear, the wealthy producer of "All in the Family," which was a liberal satire of a bigoted father named Archie Bunker and his dimwitted wife.
In a familiar liberal style, PAW pretends to represent the "American Way"[2] when in fact it spends its tax-deductible dollars in attempting to smear conservatives.
PAW tried to destroy Robert Bork's reputation in the 1980s and did a similar hatchet job on Charles Pickering in the 2000s, helping derail both jurists' nominations.[3]
Notes
- ↑ Even as PFAW holds fast to its "non-partisan" tag, the Capital Research Center reported that, in 2003 and 2004, 98 percent of the organization's political contributions went to left-liberal Democratic candidates.[1]
- ↑ [2]
- ↑ [3]