Difference between revisions of "Liberal gullibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(editing per talk page request) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are | * the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are | ||
* the [[Piltdown Man]] is the missing link, and so was the [[Nebraska Man]]! | * the [[Piltdown Man]] is the missing link, and so was the [[Nebraska Man]]! | ||
| − | * | + | * anything [[Barack Obama]] says is true, because he is for "hope and change" |
| − | * | + | * Barack Obama has no connections to [[Islam]] whatsoever |
| − | |||
(add more) | (add more) | ||
[[category:psychology]] | [[category:psychology]] | ||
[[category:politics]] | [[category:politics]] | ||
Revision as of 16:19, April 26, 2008
Liberal gullibility is the tendency of some people to too easily believe false liberal claims. Michael Moore makes a fortune from liberal gullibility and Al Gore won a Nobel Prize on the back of it.
Examples of liberal gullibility include:
- taking away guns will prevent gun crime
- global warming must be caused by man
- providing government health care for all will reduce illness
- government programs can reduce poverty by giving more money away
- the Holy Bible is not true, but the writings of atheists are
- the Piltdown Man is the missing link, and so was the Nebraska Man!
- anything Barack Obama says is true, because he is for "hope and change"
- Barack Obama has no connections to Islam whatsoever
(add more)