Changes

In ''Celotex Corp. v. Catrett'', 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986), the [[United States Supreme Court]] held that [[summary judgment]] is appropriate when the non-moving party has the burden of proof on an essential element of his case and does not make, after adequate time for discovery, a showing sufficient to establish that element.  

In '''''Celotex Corp. v. Catrett''''', 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986), the [[United States Supreme Court]] held that [[summary judgment]] is appropriate when the non-moving party has the burden of proof on an essential element of his case and does not make, after adequate time for discovery, a showing sufficient to establish that element.  

[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]