Difference between revisions of "Catholic Views On Creation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reverting and avoiding giving undue influence to the evolutionist spin)
(→‎Evolution: better cite for translation dispute)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
In 1950, [[Pope Pius XII]] forbade the [[theory of evolution]] being taught as true, although said that evidence for and against evolution should be considered.<ref>Keane, 1991, p.170.</ref>  In the [[Humani Generis]], the Pope forbade any Catholic from teaching anything contrary to the existence of one [[Adam]] and [[Eve]] as the parents of all mankind, as evolution is commonly taught.
 
In 1950, [[Pope Pius XII]] forbade the [[theory of evolution]] being taught as true, although said that evidence for and against evolution should be considered.<ref>Keane, 1991, p.170.</ref>  In the [[Humani Generis]], the Pope forbade any Catholic from teaching anything contrary to the existence of one [[Adam]] and [[Eve]] as the parents of all mankind, as evolution is commonly taught.
−
In 1996, Pope [[John Paul II]], speaking in an unfamiliar French, made a statement about the theory of evolution that was translated one way by the official Vatican newspaper, and a different way by supporters of evolution.  The newspaper translated the remarks as saying that the theory of evolution is "more than one hypothesis," while [[evolutionists]] translated it as "more than a hypothesis" and refuse to acknowledge the official newspaper translation.  The Vatican did not clarify the remarks, and the French phrase is ambiguous in its use of "une".<ref>http://webs.mn.catholic.edu.au/physics/emery/creationism.htm</ref>
+
In 1996, Pope [[John Paul II]], speaking in an unfamiliar French, made a statement about the theory of evolution that was translated one way by the official Vatican newspaper, and a different way by supporters of evolution.  The newspaper translated the remarks as saying that the theory of evolution is "more than one hypothesis," while [[evolutionists]] translated it as "more than a hypothesis" and refuse to acknowledge the official newspaper translation.  The Vatican did not clarify the remarks, and the French phrase is ambiguous in its use of "une".<ref>http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/1480_creationists_and_the_pope39_12_22_2003.asp</ref>
  
 
==Intelligent Design==
 
==Intelligent Design==

Revision as of 01:56, May 17, 2008

Catholic views on creationism have undergone change over time. Roman Catholicism, along with most branches of Christianity, generally accepted a literal interpretation of creation as presented in the book of Genesis in the Bible throughout most of its history. In more recent times however, based upon viewing increased scientific thought and discovery, the position of a literal reading of Genesis became less important.

Evolution

In 1909, the Pontifical Biblical Commission ruled that the historical sense of the creation account in Genesis 1-3 cannot be excluded. As of 1991, this ruling had not been superseded.[1]

In 1950, Pope Pius XII forbade the theory of evolution being taught as true, although said that evidence for and against evolution should be considered.[2] In the Humani Generis, the Pope forbade any Catholic from teaching anything contrary to the existence of one Adam and Eve as the parents of all mankind, as evolution is commonly taught. In 1996, Pope John Paul II, speaking in an unfamiliar French, made a statement about the theory of evolution that was translated one way by the official Vatican newspaper, and a different way by supporters of evolution. The newspaper translated the remarks as saying that the theory of evolution is "more than one hypothesis," while evolutionists translated it as "more than a hypothesis" and refuse to acknowledge the official newspaper translation. The Vatican did not clarify the remarks, and the French phrase is ambiguous in its use of "une".[3]

Intelligent Design

The Cardinal archbishop of Vienna has spoken out in support of intelligent design, while other priests have criticized it. The Vatican itself has never taken an official position on the issue.[4]

Bibliography

  • Keane, Gerard J., "Creation Rediscovered", Credis, 1991, ISBN 0 646 04291 2.

References