174
edits
Changes
Possible erotic nudity in current image is problematic
::Thank you very much. I was just worried that some young person might inadvertently stumble upon this article and take offense. The new picture is much nicer and safer. -- [[User:AdmiralNelson|AdmiralNelson]] 21:52, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
::Thank you very much. I was just worried that some young person might inadvertently stumble upon this article and take offense. The new picture is much nicer and safer. -- [[User:AdmiralNelson|AdmiralNelson]] 21:52, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
== More nudity and possible violation of Commandment 3 ==
I hate to be bothersome, and rather than do any editing, I thought I'd bring this up here first before proceeding. Given the history of this article, issues of explicit nudity concerns me. The current picture of a mural for this article which is captioned ''Mural Presencia de America Latina (Chile), by Jorge González Camarena'' has an almost totally nude woman in the center of the existing picture. [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Gonz%C3%A1lez_Camarena_Presencia_de_Am%C3%A9rica_Latina.jpg See here.] I know that it's not that clear, but if it leads any young children (or others who might not expect nudity) to actually search for this mural specifically they could easily find [http://s11.video.blip.tv/1800001345942/MarioErnesto-StilsDelMuralPresenciaDeAmericaLatina483.JPG THIS picture] (warning, not safe for those who are offended by explicit erotic pictures of naked women or young children) which is totally inappropriate for Conservapedia per Commandment 3. Note: I have Google's SAFE SEARCH turned on and still retrieved this picture and even [http://static.zooomr.com/images/4292511_9e8e8003cc.jpg this more unambiguously erotic picture] (same warning as before). Can't we put an example of a mural that is not so potentially bothersome in this article? I suggest finding something that shows mexicans being patriotic to America, rather than images that potentially promote nudity and eroticism. Please comment. I won't edit the article unless it's clear where the Conservapedia editors stand on this. --[[User:AdmiralNelson|AdmiralNelson]] 13:49, 18 June 2008 (EDT)