Difference between revisions of "User talk:HenryS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Complain below, please
(that gave me a chuckle) |
(→Hippocratic Oath: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
LOL @ ''18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. )'' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT) | LOL @ ''18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. )'' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == [[Hippocratic Oath]] == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Henry, Why did you revert my edit to [[Oath of Hippocrates]]? | ||
| + | # The entire section is about people who are ''critical'' of the oath. It makes sense to call the section "Criticism" instead of the watered down "Views". | ||
| + | # "'''Some''' Christian doctors '''may not like''' this oath" — That's just deliberately weak liberal claptrap. Do you really believe that a ''devout'' Christian can "solemnly swear to Apollo and Asclepius" — [[pagan]] Roman Gods?! What happened to "Thou shalt have no other Gods before Me?" My edit just removed the liberal, cultural-relativist POV from that sentence. Look at the history, where [[Deborah]] has been watering it down and watering it down ever since the article was created. | ||
| + | # Other than that, I just made some links to other articles — which you also reverted. | ||
| + | Can I have your permission to edit the article again for these reasons? | ||
| + | [[User:GeorgeM|GeorgeM]] 11:45, 22 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:45, July 22, 2008
Likely vandal
Hi Henry. User:NNSTK17 seems to be a vandal. Please look at his edit history. -Foxtrot 18:53, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
Unblock reason
LOL @ 18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. ) --Ed Poor Talk 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)
Hippocratic Oath
Henry, Why did you revert my edit to Oath of Hippocrates?
- The entire section is about people who are critical of the oath. It makes sense to call the section "Criticism" instead of the watered down "Views".
- "Some Christian doctors may not like this oath" — That's just deliberately weak liberal claptrap. Do you really believe that a devout Christian can "solemnly swear to Apollo and Asclepius" — pagan Roman Gods?! What happened to "Thou shalt have no other Gods before Me?" My edit just removed the liberal, cultural-relativist POV from that sentence. Look at the history, where Deborah has been watering it down and watering it down ever since the article was created.
- Other than that, I just made some links to other articles — which you also reverted.
Can I have your permission to edit the article again for these reasons? GeorgeM 11:45, 22 July 2008 (EDT)