Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chimpanzee"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I do pity him. Will you both please sign onto my post on [[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s wall on this very same subject?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:55, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | I do pity him. Will you both please sign onto my post on [[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]'s wall on this very same subject?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:55, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Category == | ||
| + | If/when the article becomes unprotected, it would be good if someone could put this article into [[:Category:Mammals]]. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:57, March 20, 2007
Great article, hope it lasts. Palmd001 23:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- It didn't mention how unlike humans are from apes. Or how in NO WAY are we "related". --Crackertalk 23:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- there it's gone --Crackertalk 23:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Conservative, cited sources are not "babble." If you disagree with them, debate it here with people who have studied up on it.--AmesG 23:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Give it up AmesG he's on a rampage. Lost in his own (very) little world. Pity him. --Crackertalk 23:41, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Conservative, you are abusing your SysOp power and are completely gutless to boot. --Dave3172 23:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
I do pity him. Will you both please sign onto my post on Aschlafly's wall on this very same subject?--AmesG 23:55, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Category
If/when the article becomes unprotected, it would be good if someone could put this article into Category:Mammals. --Interiot 23:57, 19 March 2007 (EDT)