Difference between revisions of "Talk:Massachusetts liberal"
(Reading edit summaries? Google {conservapedia FBI} instead!) |
(Undo revision 527386 by Cherylm) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I agree with y'all. This "article" doesn't even discuss what a specific liberal from MA would believe/do/say/etc. Instead, it raises petty concerns over MA generally. Get rid of this. --[[User:DJBlair|DJBlair]] 15:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT) | I agree with y'all. This "article" doesn't even discuss what a specific liberal from MA would believe/do/say/etc. Instead, it raises petty concerns over MA generally. Get rid of this. --[[User:DJBlair|DJBlair]] 15:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 16:27, October 1, 2008
So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[1], one of the lowest crime rates. [2], [3], [4], one of the lowest murder rates [5] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? JoshuaZ 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST)
- This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. DDG 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Do we really need this article
I am very conservative but I don't see a need for this article. Why not simply include it in the MA article. Conservative 22:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
-I agree. Only the first four words are relevant to the article title. The stats belong in the MA article. Bomber23k
I agree with y'all. This "article" doesn't even discuss what a specific liberal from MA would believe/do/say/etc. Instead, it raises petty concerns over MA generally. Get rid of this. --DJBlair 15:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
