Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jjameson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Whoops, that was for socialism. Working on communism.) |
(There we go.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I am adding fact tags to things that deserve a citation. Are you implying that the commonly held perception of Communism should be posted as fact, without a reputable citation? Communism is not inherently atheistic; it is only true that many communist leaders have been atheists. | :I am adding fact tags to things that deserve a citation. Are you implying that the commonly held perception of Communism should be posted as fact, without a reputable citation? Communism is not inherently atheistic; it is only true that many communist leaders have been atheists. | ||
::Well, I've added a "fact tag" for your statement; supply a reputable citation for it, please. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT) | ::Well, I've added a "fact tag" for your statement; supply a reputable citation for it, please. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::[http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/CC/fca5.html Easy.] Now, unless this encyclopedia would rather be known for getting its facts plain wrong than for its usefulness, I'd suggest we ''stick to the facts'' rather than what common opinion may hold. | ||
Revision as of 22:06, March 19, 2009
Jjameson, I think you might be at the wrong wiki. First, we don't just add fact tags when we disagree. There is plenty of material on the subject atheism+communism plus evolution/ape to man. I suggest you source the information. What we've just discussed is quite commonly understood.--jpatt 21:17, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
- I am adding fact tags to things that deserve a citation. Are you implying that the commonly held perception of Communism should be posted as fact, without a reputable citation? Communism is not inherently atheistic; it is only true that many communist leaders have been atheists.
- Well, I've added a "fact tag" for your statement; supply a reputable citation for it, please. Karajou 23:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)
- Easy. Now, unless this encyclopedia would rather be known for getting its facts plain wrong than for its usefulness, I'd suggest we stick to the facts rather than what common opinion may hold.
- Well, I've added a "fact tag" for your statement; supply a reputable citation for it, please. Karajou 23:24, 18 March 2009 (EDT)