Difference between revisions of "Mireless v. Waco"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Bold, link)
m (Corrected a typo)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In '''''Mireless v. Waco''''', 502 U.S. 9, 12-13 (1991) (''[[per curiam]]''), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] granted absolute [[judicial immunity]] to a [[judge]] despite committing an error in directing police officers to bring counsel forcibly before the court in a pending case.  The Court reasons that the order was judicial in nature, and thus absolute immunity should be available.
+
In '''''Mireless v. Waco''''', 502 U.S. 9, 12-13 (1991) (''[[per curiam]]''), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] granted absolute [[judicial immunity]] to a [[judge]] despite committing an error in directing police officers to bring counsel forcibly before the court in a pending case.  The Court reasoned that the order was judicial in nature, and thus absolute immunity should be available.
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]
 
[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]

Revision as of 15:12, October 9, 2009

In Mireless v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 12-13 (1991) (per curiam), the U.S. Supreme Court granted absolute judicial immunity to a judge despite committing an error in directing police officers to bring counsel forcibly before the court in a pending case. The Court reasoned that the order was judicial in nature, and thus absolute immunity should be available.