Difference between revisions of "User talk:Peter Ellis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Political parties) |
Peter Ellis (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | love the changes (improvements) to the Australia page - it is turning into quite a good reference. Thankyou. Bit by bit we can build a wonderful resource on this great land. --[[User:Bilby|Bilby]] 22:34, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | |
: Lets! :-) [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 22:40, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | : Lets! :-) [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 22:40, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::Is the DLP still considered a party? They ran a few candidates in last year's Victorian election and nearly got one in. Not sure what its Federal status is - politics is not my area! Well, not party politics anyway.--[[User:Bilby|Bilby]] 23:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ::Is the DLP still considered a party? They ran a few candidates in last year's Victorian election and nearly got one in. Not sure what its Federal status is - politics is not my area! Well, not party politics anyway.--[[User:Bilby|Bilby]] 23:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I've listed *federal* parties. DLP is a state thing, as yet. See recent changes. :-) [[User:Peter Ellis|Peter Ellis]] 00:04, 30 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:04, March 30, 2007
love the changes (improvements) to the Australia page - it is turning into quite a good reference. Thankyou. Bit by bit we can build a wonderful resource on this great land. --Bilby 22:34, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- Lets! :-) Peter Ellis 22:40, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- Is the DLP still considered a party? They ran a few candidates in last year's Victorian election and nearly got one in. Not sure what its Federal status is - politics is not my area! Well, not party politics anyway.--Bilby 23:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
- I've listed *federal* parties. DLP is a state thing, as yet. See recent changes. :-) Peter Ellis 00:04, 30 March 2007 (EDT)